December 13, 2016
Author: Bobbi K. Dominick
On November 21, 2016, the EEOC issued a new Enforcement Guidance covering national origin discrimination. The last time the EEOC issued something on national origin discrimination was in 2002, and this guidance includes some important issues and significant legal developments that have occurred since then. Employers would be well advised to pay close attention to such guidance, since the EEOC carefully considers not only its own policies but also court decisions in various areas of discrimination law.
The EEOC indicates that discrimination occurs when an individual is treated differently because they are from a particular country, or because they have the physical, cultural or linguistic characteristics of a particular national origin group. What this means is that if an employer engages in practices that discriminate against someone because the employer or its supervisors believe or perceive that the individual has a particular disfavored ethnicity or national origin, that can constitute national origin discrimination even if the individual is not of that heritage (i.e., discriminating against someone because they “look” or “sound” like they are Mexican, Iraqi, or Russian). This includes discrimination based on the “perception” of one’s national origin or ethnicity, based on their association with those who are of a particular national origin (i.e., married to someone of a disfavored ethnicity), or their citizenship status. In addition, the Guidance makes it clear that employers cannot rely upon customer preference as a justification for discrimination.
The EEOC takes issue with an employer who treats individuals differently because of their accent. In order to use something like accent as a reason for employment decisions, the employer must be able to document that the accent “interferes materially with job performance.” The employer must provide evidence that effective spoken communication in English is required in the particular job duties, and the accent materially interferes with the ability to communicate.
The EEOC cautions employers about language policies that might have the effect of discriminating against national origin groups. Language requirements must be required for the effective performance of the position. The level of fluency required must be assessed per job on a case by case basis, since necessity depends upon the job duties. English only rules must be justified as necessary and consistent with business necessity. A rule requiring English to be spoken at all times will be presumed to violate Title VII.
While employers are required to assure that individuals are legally authorized to work in the United States, they cannot apply different standards to individuals from particular national origins.
Employers are prohibited from segregating certain jobs for workers of a particular national origin. For example, employers cannot establish rules that only Mexican born workers can work in field picking jobs.
The EEOC shows a particular concern for the mistreatment of employees who may also be victims of human trafficking, and will easily find a hostile work environment in such situations.
INSIGHTS FOR EMPLOYERS FROM THE EEOC
Please contact a Gjording Fouser lawyer at 208.336.9777 if you would like any additional information about this topic or any other employment issues facing your company.